Posted in blogging on January 24th, 2013
By Craig

If in or near Aberdeen, Scotland you may have spotted the #sandwichvan hashtag on Twitter and it’s one of those old incidents where in-love boy and girl who work at the same place have been emailing each other, it gets a little saucy and then a wrong person gets the emails. Said wrong person responds discretely.

Now it’s gone a little viral bringing a bit of (implied) notoriety to the company they work at and it might be a misuse of IT but should anyone lose a job over it?

No. It’s embarassing, let’s not kid on but as bad as it is for the company, the people involved – who have been named online – are going to get it worse, especially the girl because that’s the way people (wrongly) treat these things.

Perhaps one person could be sacked though

Not that I’m advocating someone being sacked but this didn’t get out online by itself. Someone had to have leaked it. If there’s disciplinary action anywhere, that’s where I would put it. That’s the person that exposed the members of staff involved as well as the company.

Or is it changing times and attitudes?

A lot of younger people nowadays shrug their shoulders at this stuff and go “so, I was having sex. And?” Add this to the fact that most companies are relaxed about staff emailing each other, is this really a big thing or does it just show that the older generation are perverts for reading it and sharing?

I don’t think so. I don’t think everyone is that laidback about it and, more to the point, I don’t think many firms would just shrug it off as ‘people have sex’ but it would be nice if they could.

UPDATE: Great to see Aberdeen City Council jump into this and use the hashtag to promote road safety and traffic information:

Related Posts with Thumbnails
  • http://twitter.com/matthewmarley Matthew Marley

    Got to love some # hijacking :)

  • http://twitter.com/scottgdouglas Scott Douglas

    It looks as though the woman who shared the email with a couple of pals along with the message: “Looks like our receptionist is having a productive day … LOL” would be the obvious scapegoat.
    But wouldn’t that also be a bit harsh?If I received an email like the one which went out to that loooong list of names, there’s no doubt I’d be sharing it with my pals.The mistake lies squarely with the sender in this case.We’ve had 10 years to get used to email and the potential of the Claire Swire-effect:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claire_Swire_emailAs ever, this is nothing to do with social media (cos there was none in 2002, the Clare Swire case ‘went viral’ with nothing more than email, newspapers and proper, old-fashioned WOM).

    The Twitter hashtag and other social network stuff might make the spread a wee bit faster. 

    But global in 2000 was pretty much the same as ‘global’ in 2013. Except that 12 years on most of us stil remember the Claire Swire case. Most social media kerfuffles won’t have the same durability.

    Great story, whatever way you look at it.

  • Laura Sutherland

    Aberdeen Council did well to take advantage!

digital pr

Whether your event is a music festival or public event, promoting your company, crisis communications, internal communications...

more...

pr audit

Whether your event is a music festival or public event, promoting your company, crisis communications, internal communications...

more...

news

Whether your event is a music festival or public event, promoting your company, crisis communications, internal communications...

more...